ACCEPTING CASES NATIONWIDE

585.287.8188

CALL US

CONTACT US

Written By: Robert King, Esq.
Legal Review By: Brett Vaughn, Esq.
The Valsartan Lawsuit is an active lawsuit
See If You Qualify

Valsartan Lawsuit Overview

Valsartan is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1996 to treat high blood pressure, hypertension, and heart conditions. It was initially marketed by Novartis under the brand name Diovan. 

It is believed that hundreds of batches of the prescription drug were contaminated with NDMA, a cancer-causing agent. The discovery of this contamination led to global recalls, including by the FDA and European health officials. NDMA issues found in batches of the drug are believed to be similar to those in Zantac lawsuits.

Recalls of valsartan, which is available under multiple names, began in 2018, especially with the generic form of the drug. The widespread use of valsartan-containing drugs has led to a significant number of lawsuits. It is believed that millions may be affected. To date over 1200 lawsuits have been consolidated in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in New Jersey. Affected individuals are strongly encouraged to seek legal representation.

Valsartan Lawsuit – 2025 Updates

March 26, 2025: Valsartan Judge Sets Trial Preparation Deadline Ahead of September Bellwether Trial

The judge overseeing the Valsartan MDL has entered an order setting key deadlines to help the parties prepare for the trials set to occur in September 2025. These include giving the parties between April 11 through May 8, 2025, to question expert witnesses. Some experts who may be questioned include those on plaintiffs’ medical teams and scientists involved in making and testing this now-recalled heart and blood pressure medication. These trial preparations are important to people who have filed and who will file lawsuits related to cancers caused by Valsartan.

March 4, 2025: Fifteen More Valsartan Lawsuits Added as Preparations Continue for First Bellwether Trial

As of March 3, 2025, there are 1,303 pending claims in the Valsartan multidistrict litigation against Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co. and other drug companies. Plaintiffs claim Valsartan and drugs like it contained NDEA and NDMA, which are known probable carcinogens. The parties are preparing for one of the first Bellwether trials in this litigation, which began in 2019. Affected patients and surviving family members can join in this lawsuit.

February 25, 2025: Documents Turned Over By Valsartan Manufacturer May Help Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Strengthen Lawsuit

In a letter drafted by attorneys representing people harmed by contaminated Valsartan, lawyers say ZHP turned over evidence that solvents used in its manufacturing process may have led to contamination. One theory is that ZHP and other drug makers used cheaper ingredients and low-quality processes that led to the presence of NDMA and NDEA in Valsartan. These contaminants may have led to people who used Valsartan to develop cancer. The documents provided by manufacturers will be used as evidence in the trial.

February 6, 2025: Valsartan MDL Judge Sets Scheduling Order Ahead of Test Trials

On February 3, 2025, Judge Renee Bumb entered an order scheduling times to complete and address key legal issues ahead of the test trials in the Valsartan multidistrict litigation (MDL). Plaintiffs believe this heart medication that the FDA approved in the late 1990s was contaminated with a cancer-causing substance, NDMA. The federal court’s order seeks to resolve pending matters, such as questioning experts and submitting their reports. This litigation is still active and people who were diagnosed with various cancers, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and multiple myeloma after taking Valsartan can still join the lawsuit.

January 16, 2025: 1,288 Lawsuits Pending in the Valsartan Federal Litigation

Many people have joined the consolidated lawsuits against Valsartan manufacturers (MDL 1875). Attorneys in these cases are preparing to hold bellwether (test) trials. Heading into these trials, the total pending lawsuits against the makers of Valsartan—a heart and blood pressure medication—reached 1,288 as of January 2, 2025. The plaintiffs claim many batches of Valsartan were contaminated with N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Lab studies reveal that NDMA may cause cancer and hepatic (liver) injuries. Plaintiffs are encouraged to contact a lawyer if they take Valsartan and suffer serious harm.

December 20, 2024: Federal Valsartan MDL Judge Approves 5 Cases for Second Set of Test Trials

On December 16, 2024, the federal judge in the lawsuit against manufacturers of Valsartan entered an order that confirmed the selection of five lawsuits for the second round of bellwether trials. Bellwether trials are a select group of cases that serve as test trials for other cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). Many people who were harmed by Valsartan have joined MDL 2875, which represents people harmed by NDMA contamination in Valsartan and other medications. These five test trials can predict how other cases in the MDL might be decided, so these cases are very important to all plaintiffs in the MDL.

December 10, 2024: Valsartan Judge in Federal Lawsuit Sets Important Deadlines to Advance Case

On December 4, 2024, Judge Renee Bumb—the Judge managing the Valsartan MDL—entered an order setting key deadlines to help advance the lawsuit to the next stage. For example, the order gives a deadline of February 14, 2025, for the parties to finish fact discovery for individual cases. Additionally, the plaintiffs have until February 28, 2025, to pick experts they will use to support their legal arguments.  

December 4, 2024: Parties Discuss Concerns Before Status Hearing in Valsartan Lawsuit

On December 3, 2024, the plaintiffs and defendants submitted letters to the judge in the Valsartan multidistrict lawsuit (MDL 2875). In the letters, each side gives their opinions on unresolved issues in the case. For example, they discuss whether the plaintiffs should dismiss claims against defendants who have not been served with paperwork yet. Additionally, they discuss waivers and what cases should proceed to the Bellwether (test) trial stage of the lawsuit.

November 19, 2024: Plaintiffs Send Letter Proposing Schedule for Expert Reports in Valsartan Multidistrict Litigation

On November 19, 2024, the plaintiffs sent a letter to the judge in MDL 2875, explaining their positions about the timing of expert reports and questioning. The plaintiffs think the defendants should file their expert reports before the plaintiffs question their experts. The plaintiffs believe this is fair, aligns with customary practice, and allows them to question their experts about matters the defendants’ experts discuss in their reports.

November 15, 2024: Parties Agree to Deadlines in Valsartan MDL Case Set for Bellwether Trial

On November 12, 2024, the defendants in the Valsartan MDL case sent a case scheduling letter to the Judge. In it, the defendants outline the agreed-upon deadlines for milestones—like the case-specific discovery—in one of the lawsuits with an upcoming Bellwether trial. The letter notes that the parties disagree on the appropriate deadlines for questioning experts. The parties will discuss this more on November 19, 2024.

November 8, 2024: Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Valsartan MDL Request More Time to Respond

In an October 29, 2024, letter to the Honorable Renee Marie Bumb, attorneys for the plaintiffs in the Valsartan multidistrict lawsuit (MDL 2875) asked for an extension to submit information. The defendants, who represent Valsartan manufacturers, drafted a letter that plaintiffs had to respond to. The previous day, the defendants had sent a letter to the Judge recommending new deadlines for the Bellwether trial (i.e., test trial) preparations and start dates. The plaintiffs asked for an extension past the November 12, 2024, response deadline. Judge Bumb granted the plaintiffs’ extension request during the hearing on October 29, 2024.

November 1, 2024: Lawyers Suggest Schedules for Bellwether Trial Preparation in Valsartan Litigation

On October 29, 2024, the plaintiffs and defendants in the Valsartan MDL sent letters to the judge to suggest schedules for the Bellwether trial preparations. Previously, the judge said these six trials would begin in early November. Now, the first trial won’t start until September 2, 2025. The plaintiffs asked to finalize trial preparations by August 15, 2025. Defendants asked for an August 22, 2025, deadline instead. Bellwether trials are a small group of test trials that help determine how future, similar cases will play. They are used to establish common evidence and predict success for future Plaintiffs.

October 15, 2024: Plaintiffs in Valsartan Litigation Look to Dismiss Defendant’s Expert Witness

In a letter to the Honorable Renée Marie Bumb, the Chief Judge in the Valsartan multidistrict litigation, lawyers for the plaintiffs asked for an expert witness to be dismissed. Dr. Chodosh was an expert witness for the defendants. Plaintiff’s attorneys said Dr. Chodosh should not be allowed to testify before the jury. The attorneys stated that the Valsartan trial is an economic loss trial based on regulatory standards. Dr. Chodosh was an expert witness for general causation, which they argue is not relevant to this trial. Therefore, they say Dr. Chodosh’s expert testimony is not relevant. A final decision on this matter will be made by Judge Bumb.

October 3, 2024: First Valsartan Bellwether Trial Set for November

The first bellwether trial for the Valsartan lawsuit will begin in November. Bellwether trials reflect the larger group of cases and are used to determine how a jury will react to the evidence and arguments presented. They also influence settlement discussions. As of October 2024, there are approximately 1,200 filed cases in this MDL. The court has scheduled oral arguments for October 8th to address unresolved issues regarding discovery and testimony in preparation for the upcoming trial.

October 1, 2024: Son Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Alleging Valsartan and Irbesartan Caused Mother’s Multiple Myeloma

On September 26, 2024, the son of a deceased Missouri woman filed a lawsuit on behalf of his mother, alleging that her use of Valsartan and Irbesartan caused her to develop multiple myeloma. The complaint against Mylan Laboratories Ltd. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. claims that the defendants were negligent and failed to warn of the dangerous side effects of the drugs. The lawsuit demands punitive damages and wrongful death.

September 1, 2024: Valsartan Trial Rescheduled for Fall 2024 Under New Judge

The first Valsartan trial is back on track for the fall of 2024. Originally scheduled for earlier this year, the trial was delayed due to the judge’s illness. The case has since been transferred to a new judge, the Honorable Renee Marie Bumb, who has made it clear that the trial will proceed as planned. Jury selection is set for late October, with three to four weeks of testimony beginning in early November.

August 1, 2024: Rescheduling of Valsartan Lawsuit Case Management Conference and Daubert Hearings

Judge Rene Marie Bumb has rescheduled the next Valsartan lawsuit Case Management Conference from August 21, 2024, to Wednesday, September 18, 2024, at 1:00 PM. At this time, the Court will conduct Daubert hearings on the proposed testimony for several experts. “Daubert” hearings are used in complex cases so the judge can assess the relevancy and reliability of expert testimony. The Daubert standard typically uses the following factors: whether the technique or theory in question can be, and has been, tested; whether it has been subjected to publication and peer review; its known or potential error rate; the existence and maintenance of standards controlling its operation; and whether it has attracted widespread acceptance within a relevant scientific community.

The “Daubert Standard” was established in the 1993 case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and revolutionized the way courts evaluate expert testimony.

June 18, 2024: Plaintiffs Seek Sanctions Against ZHP for Failure to Produce CEO in Valsartan Case

An important motion has been made in the Valsartan Lawsuit. The brief, filed by plaintiff lawyers, addresses whether a penalty, also known as a sanction, should be paid by defendant ZHP. ZHP has failed to produce their CEO for a deposition, despite being ordered by the court to do so. The judge previously ordered sanctions against the company. The brief alleges a particular email that admits the company knew the process used to create Valsartan created NDMA. Plaintiff’s counsel further argues that there are other significant gaps in the production of documents by Defendant ZHP. A special master previously ordered that an adverse inference be applied at the time of trial in the Valsartan MDL.

June 9, 2024: Special Master Appointed in Valsartan Lawsuit to Oversee Complex Discovery Issues

Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie (Ret.) is assigned as the Special Master in the Valsartan Lawsuit. The Special Master is usually a retired judge or attorney acting as a court-appointed representative to sort through and guide specific and complex issues of the case, such as discovery. Judge Vanaskie recently scheduled a conference for June 21, 2024, to discuss the scheduling for the lawsuit as well as any other necessary issues related to the claims. Chief Judge Renee Bumb will be meeting with Judge Vanaskie the following week, on June 25, 2024.

June 8, 2024: Details of the Valsartan Class Action Lawsuit – Divisions and Allegations

The Valsartan Class Action Lawsuit is comprised of three parts: first, the personal injury claims; second, medical monitoring claims; and third, the economic loss claims. The lawsuit alleges that several manufacturers produced Valsartan and Losartan containing the carcinogen NDMA. It is believed that the contamination was caused by the manufacturing process used to produce Valsartan and Losartan. One complicating factor is that cancer can develop years after exposure to a toxic substance like NDMA. Everyone who paid for a contaminated drug can request a refund through the class action lawsuit. Individuals with cancer have a separate personal injury claim. Additionally, those who were exposed can also apply for medical monitoring if they have not yet received a diagnosis that might be related to Valsartan exposure.

May 5, 2024: Valsartan Trial Assignment and Plaintiff’s Request for Conference

The reason for the delay in the Valsartan Trial is now clear. The case has been reassigned to another judge. MDL 2875 In Re: Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation is now assigned to the Honorable Renedd Bumb. By a letter dated April 25, 2024, plaintiffs have requested an in-person conference with the new judge to address the status of the litigation and the third-party payor subclass trial that was scheduled for March 18, 2024.

April 9, 2024: No New Trial Date Scheduled for Valsartan Lawsuits

There is still no new trial date scheduled in the Valsartan Lawsuit. There have been several pre-trial motions decided in this bellwether trial. The federal court filing system known as “PACER” shows that a status conference occurred on March 27, 2024, and the transcript was posted under seal the next day. Whatever happened at that conference seems important. We think it is unlikely that the Valsartan trial is going forward this month since there is no trial date officially set at this point.

April 1, 2024: Valsartan Class Action Certification and Personal Injury Claims

The valsartan lawsuit has two distinct parts. First, there is the class action lawsuit. The Valsartan class action was certified by the US District Court for New Jersey in December of 2023. The class action certification does not decide whether any defendant did anything wrong; it simply allows different classes of plaintiffs to bring their cases in an efficient manner. The classes in the Valsartan class action lawsuit are: 1) consumer economic loss class, 2) medical monitoring class, and 3) the Third-Party Payor Class. In addition to the class action lawsuit, there are personal injury claims, which are separate from the class action. The personal injury cases allege that contaminated generic Valsartan caused cancer. Our firm is investigating valsartan cancer cases.

March 26, 2024: Key Decision Issued Ahead of Valsartan Trial by Judge Kugler

Judge Kugler has issued an important decision in advance of the Valsartan bellwether trial that was supposed to start 10 days ago. The Order, issued today, largely denies the request for decisions as a matter of law. Both plaintiffs and the defendants asked Judge Kugler to rule on at least 16 issues based on the documents and deposition testimony that have been produced so far. The Judge did, however, grant one important request made by the Plaintiffs. He ruled that defendants’ affirmations, statements, and labeling of the generic Valsartan they produce was an “express warranty.” Since the judge has already ruled that the statements of the defense were express warranties, they will not be able to challenge whether or not there were express warranties in front of the Jury. There is not yet a new trial date in the Valsartan MDL. We expect a date soon.

March 21, 2024: Study Links NDMA-Contaminated Valsartan to Increased Cancer Risk

Several scientific studies have linked the use of Valsartan contaminated with NDMA to an increased risk of cancer. One study compared 1.4 million people and their cancer rates. The control group consisted of the population that was taking Valsartan before the contamination date, and the other group took the contaminated Valsartan. The study was titled “Nitrosodimethylamine-Contaminated Valsartan and Risk of Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 1.4 Million Valsartan Users.” It was published in the Journal of the American Heart Association on December 20, 2022.

March 20, 2024: Valsartan Lawsuit Status Update

The Valsartan trail has been postponed. There is some indication that a member of the Court has become ill. There are also several pretrial motions that have not been decided yet. It is unclear when the trial will begin. It is possible that the court could grant summary judgment and say that certain manufacturers provided contaminated drugs. Plaintiff’s lawyers argue that Valsartan was clearly contaminated and several government findings confirms that much of the Valsartan sold between 2015 and 2018 was not pure. If summary judgement is granted there may be a damages only trial.

March 2024: To date, 1,231 lawsuits are pending, 1,398 have been filed, and no settlements have been made. Litigation continues. 

August 2023: The number of lawsuits pending in the MDL expands to over 1,200. 

January 2023: After a court ruling allows cases to move forward using scientific study findings, the number of lawsuits grows to over 1,000. 

February 2019: Valsartan lawsuits are consolidated in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in New Jersey.

This infographic shows a timeline of significant events in the Valsartan lawsuit starting in 1996.

Table of Contents:

What is Valsartan and How Does It Work?

Valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) marketed by Novartis, was originally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1996 under the brand name Diovan. It is primarily used to treat high blood pressure, heart failure, and diabetic kidney disease. In 2012, after the Novartis’ patent expired, the market saw an expansion of generic valsartan. Most of the generic forms of the drug were produced overseas. 

Valsartan-containing drugs relax blood vessels, reducing blood pressure and increasing the blood and oxygen supply to the heart. It works almost immediately, reducing blood pressure around two hours after initial intake. The drug achieves full effectiveness within two to four weeks.

There are nearly two dozen pharmaceutical companies that manufacture valsartan-containing ARBs. By 2019, many of the generic versions of the brand had been recalled by the FDA due to the discovery of unacceptable limits of impurities. This led to the FDA fast-tracking a new generic version of the drug to help mitigate shortages caused by these recalls. 

What Is Valsartan Used For?

Valsartan is primarily used to reduce high blood pressure. It inhibits angiotensin II binding to the AT1 receptor, reducing vasoconstriction and aldosterone synthesis. In a short amount of time, valsartan-containing drugs facilitate easier blood flow and reduce the heart’s workload.

Primary uses of valsartan:

  • Lower high blood pressure (hypertension)
  • Treat heart failure
  • Reduce hospitalization risk from heart failure
  • Improve post-heart attack survival rates
  • Manage diabetic kidney disease

The drug is often prescribed for heart and left ventricular failure after a heart attack. Millions of people have been prescribed valsartan-containing drugs, particularly generic versions of the medication.

This infographic explains what Valsartan is, what it's used for, and why it was recalled.

Valsartan Side Effects and Injuries

There are a number of known or reported side effects associated with taking valsartan. While some symptoms may be relatively mild, many patients have reported serious health conditions related to prolonged use of the drug. 

Our law firm is accepting the following cancers as injuries for the valsartan lawsuit:

  • Colorectal/colon/rectal
  • Intestinal (including small intestine)
  • Stomach/gastric
  • Liver
  • Esophageal
  • Prostate
  • Blood (including Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Multiple myeloma, and Leukemia)
  • Bladder
  • Lung (Will need to know smoking history)

Potential side effects of valsartan:

  • Dizziness
  • Headache
  • Excessive or unusual tiredness
  • Diarrhea
  • Nausea
  • Stomach pain
  • Back and joint pain
  • Blurred vision
  • Paresthesia (tingling or numbness)
  • Muscle aches
  • Cough
  • Cold sweats and fever
  • Confusion or nervousness

The drug may also cause serious side effects such as difficulty breathing or swallowing, hoarseness, and swelling of the face, tongue, throat, eyes, hands, or feet. 

Patients taking valsartan should seek emergency medical treatment for any adverse health conditions, including bloody urine or a decrease in the frequency or amount of urine, an irregular heartbeat, low blood pressure, or increased thirst. The drug may also cause unexplained weight gain, bone pain, and hives or a rash.  

Most Common Side Effects of Valsartan

The most common side effects of valsartan are typically mild and temporary but may result in discomfort, including abdominal pain, dizziness, and changes in blood pressure. Patients affected by serious or persistent side effects related to valsartan usage should consult with their doctor. 

Common side effects of valsartan: 

  • Flu-like symptoms (cough, fatigue, joint pain)
  • Abdominal pain
  • Back pain
  • Diarrhea
  • Dizziness
  • Headache
  • High blood potassium (hyperkalemia)
  • Low blood pressure (hypotension)
  • Vomiting

Many of these symptoms are transient in nature and do not require stopping the use of valsartan. Symptoms should be discussed with a primary care physician to determine the best treatment plan moving forward.

This infographic lists all of the possible side effects of Valsartan usage and makes note of the most common and the serious side effects.

Brand Names for Valsartan

Valsartan has been marketed under a number of name brands and generic versions of the medication. It was initially approved under the name brand Diovan in 1996. The drug is available in single-ingredient and multi-ingredient formulations. 

Brand-name valsartan medications:

  • Diovan (single-ingredient)
  • Prexxartan (single-ingredient)
  • Valturna 
  • Exforge 
  • Exforge HCT 
  • Diovan HCT
  • Byvalson 
  • Vyduo
  • Entresto

Currently, over two dozen manufacturers make valsartan-containing drugs in single-ingredient or multi-ingredient formulations. There are several options available for patients throughout the United States and across the globe.

Drug Companies Involved in the Valsartan Lawsuit:

By 2018, it was discovered that potentially hundreds of batches of valsartan had been contaminated with NDMA (N-nitrosodimethylamine), particularly generic versions of the drug manufactured overseas. It is alleged that Zhejiang Huahai (a Chinese pharmaceutical company) was the primary manufacturer of the contaminated lots. The drugs were then distributed by U.S. companies, including Teva Pharmaceuticals and Solco Healthcare. 

Pharmaceutical companies involved in the manufacture or distribution of valsartan:

  • Zhejiang Huahai (manufacturer)
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Solco Healthcare
  • Actavis
  • A-S Medication Solutions
  • AvKARE
  • Bryant Ranch Prepack
  • Camber Pharmaceuticals
  • Hetero Labs, Inc.
  • HJ Harkins Company
  • Major Pharmaceuticals
  • Mylan Pharmaceuticals
  • Northwind Pharmaceuticals
  • NuCare Pharmaceuticals
  • Preferred Pharmaceuticals
  • Prinston Pharmaceutical
  • RemedyRepack Inc.
  • Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited

The contaminant found in valsartan is the same potentially cancer-causing toxin at the center of Zantac lawsuits. Individuals who have been exposed to NMDA as a result of taking valsartan are strongly encouraged to consult with an attorney as soon as possible.

Valsartan Mechanism of Action

Valsartan blocks angiotensin II by selectively binding to the angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1), preventing its vasoconstrictive and aldosterone-secreting effects. It provides comprehensive angiotensin II antagonism, which affects blood vessels, aldosterone production, cardiac function, and sodium reabsorption.

Unlike ACE inhibitors, valsartan prevents the action of angiotensin II regardless of its production pathway, ensuring a complete receptor blockade. It also directly acts on receptors without influencing bradykinin levels. 

Ingredients in Valsartan

Diovan, a popular name-brand of the drug, contains 80 mg or 160 mg of valsartan, depending on the dosage. However, the active ingredient dosage depends on the specific brand. Most versions of the drug also contain a number of inactive ingredients that also differ by brand.

Inactive ingredients in Diovan (a name-brand version of valsartan):

  • Cellulose compounds
  • Crospovidone
  • Gelatin
  • Iron oxides
  • Magnesium stearate
  • Povidone
  • Sodium lauryl sulfate
  • Titanium dioxide

Different versions of the drug contain varying levels of the active ingredient (valsartan) and inactive ingredients.

Valsartan Recalls – FDA List of Recalled Medications

On July 13, 2015, the FDA issued a press release calling for the voluntary recall of several valsartan-containing medications following the detection of an impurity in multiple batches of the drug. The recall affected various manufacturers and was due to the discovery of a potentially carcinogenic toxin known as NDMA. Patients were advised to continue using the medication until they were able to secure a replacement product. 

Manufacturers involved in the recall include:

  • A-S Medication Solutions LLC
  • Aurobindo Pharma
  • AvKARE Inc.
  • Bryant Ranch Prepack Inc.
  • Hetero Labs
  • Major Pharmaceuticals
  • Mylan Pharmaceuticals
  • Northwind Pharmaceuticals
  • NuCare Pharmaceuticals
  • Preferred Pharmaceuticals
  • RemedyRepack Inc.
  • Rising Pharmaceuticals
  • Solco Healthcare LLC
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Torrent Pharmaceuticals

Impacted medications include those containing valsartan with amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, or both. Valsartan with Hydrochlorothiazide by Alembic was not affected by the recall. Some companies, including Solco Healthcare LLC, who were part of the recall, provide customer reimbursement.

Eligibility to File a Valsartan Lawsuit

Individuals must meet certain eligibility requirements to file a personal injury lawsuit. In order to determine whether you meet the criteria, you need to speak with an attorney as soon as possible. 

Criteria for a Valsartan lawsuit:

  • Proof of at least 6 months of valsartan use between 2015 to 2019 prior to cancer diagnosis (can be in combination with HCTZ and/or Amlodipine)
  • Relevant post-2017 cancer diagnosis 
  • Not currently represented by an attorney

Only certain cancer diagnoses will qualify. Qualifying cancer diagnoses may include colorectal, intestinal, stomach, liver, esophageal, prostate, blood, bladder, or lung. 

Evidence to Gather Before Filing a Valsartan Lawsuit:

Valsartan lawsuits are based on evidence. Therefore, it is critical to gather evidence prior to filing a lawsuit. 

Evidence you may need to collect includes:

  • Medical records
  • Proof of Valsartan usage
  • Cancer diagnosis details
  • Other relevant documentation to support your case

Working with an attorney as early in the process as possible can help ensure you secure all necessary documents and information.

This infographic lists the eligibility requirements for a Valsartan lawsuit. This infographic lists the cancers that qualify in a Valsartan lawsuit. This infographic lists evidence that is useful in a Valsartan case.

Recoverable Damages in the Valsartan Lawsuit

Damages in a Valsartan lawsuit are based on a number of factors, including the severity of a person’s injuries and financial losses. Compensation in these cases may include coverage of medical expenses, lost wages, and future care and treatment. 

Generally, both economic and non-economic damages are available. An attorney can help ensure you receive financial recovery for all of your Valsartan-induced injuries, including your long-term care, physical pain, mental anguish, diminished quality of life, and more. Under certain circumstances, individuals who have lost a loved one may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit on their behalf. 

Statute of Limitations for Valsartan Lawsuits

Under most circumstances, there is a two-year statute of limitations on Valsartan lawsuit cases; however, the deadlines vary by state. The statute of limitations begins to toll once the injury is discovered, such as a valsartan-related cancer diagnosis. Prompt filing of a case ensures the best chance for a successful claim. Since there is no federal statute of limitations, it is imperative to work with an attorney to ensure your claim is filed timely. 

How to File a Valsartan Lawsuit

If you were diagnosed with cancer after taking valsartan, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit. The first step in filing a lawsuit is to consult with an attorney. An attorney can help determine whether you have a valid claim for damages. Next, you need to understand the statute of limitations and make sure that your claim is filed timely. 

Working with your attorney, you will need to gather evidence, including the necessary documents to prove your case. Finally, your legal representative will assist you in filing the appropriate paperwork to start your claim.

Infographic showing a small flow chart of the steps in a Valsartan lawsuit process: Consult an attorney, gather evidence, and file the lawsuit. The infographic notes the statute of limitations on a Valsartan lawsuit.

Valsartan Payout and Settlement Amounts

While payouts will vary depending on the severity of the injury, valsartan usage, and type of cancer, anticipated average settlements in Valsartan lawsuits are expected to be between $100,000 and $400,000. 

Settlements are generally categorized into three categories based on the individual’s injury severity, drug usage, age, and cancer type. Top-tier settlements could be $400,000 or more. Middle-tier settlements will potentially be between $200,000 and $300,000. Bottom-tier payouts may be $100,000 or less. The estimated average settlement is expected to be between $150,000 and $200,000.

Contact a Valsartan Lawsuit Attorney Today

If you were diagnosed with cancer after taking valsartan, you may be eligible to take legal action. It is important to act fast to ensure compliance with all statutes of limitations and other legal deadlines. Contact King Law today to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

When will the Valsartan lawsuit be settled?
Valsartan lawsuits may take a few months to over a year to settle. Currently, there have been over 1,300 lawsuits filed against valsartan manufacturers and distributors. More than 1,200 of these cases have been consolidated in an MDL.
What is the complaint against Valsartan?
In 2018, it was discovered that hundreds of batches of valsartan-containing prescriptions contained impurities, including NDMA, the possibly cancer-causing toxin at the center of many Zantac lawsuits.
Is there a class action lawsuit against Valsartan?
Over 1,200 cases against valsartan manufacturers and distributors have been consolidated in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in New Jersey.
What is the Valsartan lawsuit payout?
Due to the early stages of litigation for most Valsartan lawsuits, there have not been any settlements or verdicts yet. However, anticipated average payouts are expected between $150,000 and $200,000.
Why is there a lawsuit against Valsartan?
In 2018, the potentially carcinogenic toxin NDMA was detected in hundreds of batches of valsartan-containing drugs.
What is the lawsuit against Valsartan?
The lawsuit against valsartan rests on the fact that dangerous impurities were found in hundreds of batches of the drug. The impurities included potentially cancer-causing toxins.
Does the Valsartan recall warrant a lawsuit?
The courts will decide the validity of the lawsuits; however, the contaminant found in valsartan-containing substances is the same as the one at the center of the Zantac lawsuits.
Has anyone won a Valsartan lawsuit?
Valsartan lawsuits are in their infancy; therefore, none have been settled or tried.
Have any lawsuits been filed against manufacturers of Valsartan 320?
Valsartan drugs containing 320 mg, such as those manufactured by Solco Healthcare, were subject to the FDA recall.
Who are the defendants in the Valsartan class action lawsuit?
Defendants in Valsartan lawsuits are manufacturers and distributors of the drug with batches affected by the contamination.
Why did they take Valsartan off the market?
Valsartan-containing drugs were recalled after NDMA was detected in hundreds of batches of the prescription medication.