Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit – July 2026 Update

The Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Is An Active Lawsuit

See If You Qualify

People are filing spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lawsuits alleging the devices lead to injuries or do not provide adequate pain management. Lawsuits accuse companies like Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, and Nevro Corp of not properly disclosing the possible risks of these devices. Some patients have experienced shocking, burning, lead migration, autonomic dysfunction, neurological injuries, and a lack of pain relief after having a spinal cord stimulator implanted.

In their lawsuits, patients say they were not properly warned about the alleged risks associated with SCSs. Additionally, some lawsuits allege that some manufacturers heavily modified SCS devices but did not go through appropriate FDA approvals. After experiencing injuries, undergoing revision surgeries, or requiring the removal of the implant, some people suffered financial, physical, and mental setbacks. In an effort to gain compensation for these losses, people are filing spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.

Who Qualifies for a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit?

You may qualify to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit if you received a spinal cord stimulator from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Nevro, or another manufacturer and:

• You experienced shocks, burns, lead migration, worsening pain, neurological injuries, or autonomic dysfunction
• You needed revision surgery or device removal
• Your family member died after alleged complications from a spinal cord stimulator

Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit – 2026 Updates

June 5, 2026: Multidistrict Litigation Created for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has approved a request to create a dedicated MDL for spinal cord stimulator lawsuits against Boston Scientific. The new MDL is called In re Boston Scientific Corporation Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3181). Judge Josephine L. Staton is assigned to the MDL, and the MDL has been centralized in the Central District of California. People who have a valid spinal cord stimulator claim against Boston Scientific can file or transfer their claim into the MDL.

May 28, 2026: JPML Hears Case For Centralizing Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits

On May 28, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) heard arguments about creating an MDL for lawsuits involving alleged spinal cord stimulator injuries. The JPML will consider if creating an MDL will benefit all parties involved, including the defendants (Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific Corporation), and the people alleging injuries. If an MDL is created, it would give people who want to file spinal cord stimulator injury lawsuits a new option. If the MDL is not approved, lawsuits will continue in state courts, as opposed to a federal venue.

April 16, 2026: JPML to Hear Case for Centralizing Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits

A request has been submitted to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to centralize multiple spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in federal court. The JPML will hold a hearing on May 28, 2026. If the JPML decides to approve the request, that will create a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for those alleging injuries from spinal cord stimulators. There are 12 plaintiffs listed in the centralization request, all of whom allege injuries from Boston Scientific’s or Abbott Laboratories’ spinal cord stimulators. If the MDL is created, it would allow plaintiffs to share in some pre-trial tasks, such as discovery (i.e., exchanging of information), expert testimonies and reports, and other important processes. An MDL can reduce the burdens on current and future plaintiffs, defendants, and the courts. People can still file spinal cord stimulator lawsuits at this time, whether or not the MDL is created.

February 20, 2026: Motion to Centralize Spinal Cord Stimulators Lawsuits Submitted to Federal Panel

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has received a motion to centralize lawsuits filed by people alleging injuries from their spinal cord stimulator devices. If the JPML approves their motion, it would initiate a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for people seeking legal action against spinal cord stimulator manufacturers. If approved, MDL #3181 Abbott and Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation would be created. Lawyers for the plaintiffs are requesting that all actions regarding their plaintiffs’ cases be consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The JPML has not taken action on the petition yet. Plaintiffs in existing lawsuits allege that their spinal cord stimulators caused them multiple types of injuries, including “unsatisfactory pain relief, shocking, burning, lead migration, autonomic dysfunction, and neurological injuries.” Further, plaintiffs allege that Abbott and Boston Scientific did not do enough to protect them from or warn them about these possible injuries. According to the motion, there are 15 lawsuits in five different jurisdictions that could be centralized in a federal litigation.

Read More News About Spinal Cord Stimulators and Associated Lawsuits

About the Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit:

Why Are People Suing Spinal Cord Stimulator Manufacturers?

People are suing some manufacturers of spinal cord stimulators because they say the devices either did not help with their chronic pain and, in some cases, caused injuries to patients. In their lawsuits, plaintiffs allege that things manufacturers did and did not do contributed to their choosing to have a spinal cord stimulator installed and their subsequent injuries.

Here are some of the allegations submitted by plaintiffs who have filed spinal cord stimulator lawsuits:

• Design defects
• Failure to warn physicians and patients
• Injuries like burns, shocks, nervous system issues, and incontinence
• Lack of pain relief
• Misuse of PMA supplements and subsequent device modifications
• Revision surgeries or device removal due to alleged complications or injuries

Legal Grounds in Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits

Patients are suing spinal cord stimulator manufacturers, such as Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott Laboratories, because they allege that some models of spinal cord stimulators did not provide pain relief or resulted in injuries.

According to lawsuits filed by plaintiffs, here are the legal grounds and allegations in spinal cord stimulator lawsuits:

• Manufacturers used a Premarket Approval (PMA) to advance spinal cord stimulators to market, but they failed to offer independent clinical data about the safety of their devices or how well these devices worked.
• Manufacturers have introduced new SCS devices that are significantly different than the devices for which they received PMA for, using supplements to their initial PMAs.
• Manufacturers have failed to comply with regulatory requirements and provide adequate information to physicians and patients.

What This Means for Patients

The legal grounds of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that some medical device manufacturers did not follow certain FDA rules for their medical devices. Lawsuits allege that manufacturers sidestepped the FDA’s approval process and made unregulated changes to some SCS models. Additionally, lawsuits allege that SCS manufacturers did not conduct all required reporting or monitoring, meaning physicians and patients could not perform a true risk assessment of a spinal cord stimulator. If these allegations can be proven in court, it means that decisions made by SCS manufacturers may have resulted in injuries to some patients.

What Are the Alleged Injuries in Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits?

Plaintiffs who have filed spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have cited numerous injuries. Spinal cord stimulators interact with the body’s nervous system, meaning they have the potential to affect multiple functions and systems within a patient’s body.

Here are some of the injuries people with spinal cord stimulators are alleged to have experienced:

• Autonomic dysfunction (issues with circulatory or digestive systems)
• Burning
• Device lead migration
• Explant surgery (device removal)
• Loss of bowel control
• Loss of bladder control
• New or worsening pain
• Paralysis
• Revision surgery (repeat surgery to address device issues)
• Shocking sensations
• Death

This is not a full list of all possible injuries that someone may experience after having an SCS implanted. Patients who are unsure if their injury may qualify for a lawsuit can speak with our team to understand their legal options.

Who Can File a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit?

In order for someone to file a lawsuit against a spinal cord stimulator, they need to have experienced certain injuries or losses. The following people may be eligible to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit:

• A patient alleging certain injuries related to their SCS (e.g., shocks, burns, lead migration, autonomic dysfunction, or neurological injuries)
• A patient who did not experience adequate pain relief after SCS implantation
• A patient who had to have their SCS removed or repaired due to alleged device issues
• A surviving family member of someone who passed away but experienced alleged SCS injuries (i.e., a wrongful death claim)
• A spouse or child claiming losses due to alleged SCS injuries experienced by a spouse or parent

The spinal cord stimulator litigation is evolving. This list does not cover all of the things that could make someone eligible for a lawsuit. Our team of attorneys can advise on current eligible conditions and losses.

Is There a Group Lawsuit for Spinal Cord Stimulator Injuries?

On June 5, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created a type of centralized litigation called a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for some spinal cord stimulator lawsuits. The MDL is called In re Boston Scientific Corporation Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3181). This centralized legal action will allow lawsuits against one spinal cord stimulator manufacturer (i.e., Boston Scientific Corporation) to proceed in federal court. In its conditional transfer order, the JPML transferred 12 spinal cord lawsuits against Boston Scientific to federal court. Other eligible plaintiffs alleging injuries from Boston Scientific’s SCSs can file as part of this MDL.

The JPML did not choose to centralize lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories or Nevro. However, that is because it did not want to complicate the litigation. A future MDL could be created for patients alleging injuries from Abbott Laboratories and other manufacturers. These lawsuits can still move forward in state courts. You can read insights about the spinal cord stimulator MDL from our lead attorney, Robert King.

What Is Spinal Cord Stimulation?

Spinal cord stimulation (also called neuromodulation therapy) is when a medical device sends electrical signals to nerves in the spine, with the goal of decreasing someone’s pain. To stimulate the spine, doctors implant a device called a spinal cord stimulator. These devices are sometimes known as pain pacemakers.

The spinal stimulation device has leads (like electrode stickers doctors put on your chest for an EKG), and these send electrical signals through the spinal cord. The device is implanted under the skin and often controlled and monitored wirelessly. This allows the patient and their medical team to see how the device is working and adjust the settings as needed.

Spinal cord stimulators are meant to be used after other surgical or medication-based treatments have been unsuccessful. Some of the conditions that spinal cord stimulators might be used to treat include nerve damage caused by diabetes (diabetic neuropathy), pain that does not go away after a back surgery (failed back surgery syndrome), and complex regional pain syndrome.

How Does a Spinal Cord Stimulator Work?

A spinal cord stimulator is a device that is implanted in someone’s back to help relieve severe or chronic pain (e.g., pain that does not go away). The device delivers a signal that helps to stop or mask the nerve pain signal, so the patient should feel a tingling or neutral sensation instead of shooting, sharp, or dull pain.

There are several different types of spinal cord stimulators. Some of them have rechargeable batteries that are implanted inside the patient. Others require the patient to have another surgery when their spinal cord stimulator’s battery runs out. Typically, patients can send the electrical signal themselves, which gives them more control over their pain relief. Spinal cord stimulator devices are controversial, and some medical professionals question whether they are truly effective, safe, and preferred over other, less-invasive measures.

Possible Spinal Cord Stimulator Side Effects

As with any procedure or medical implant, there is a range of possible side effects associated with spinal stimulators. Side effects of spinal cord stimulators include:

• Pain, discomfort, or mild swelling where the doctors implanted the device
• Tingling, twitching, or jolts of electricity
• Painful tingling
• Numbness
• Weakness
• Difficulty controlling or coordinating muscle movements
• Headaches
• Leaking spinal fluid
• Painful swelling or oozing from the implant site
• Sharp pain randomly or when moving
• Burning sensation
• Pain levels stay the same or worsen after the device is implanted
• Fever or chills

Some of these symptoms may show up right after you have the surgery to implant the spinal cord stimulator. However, these may appear days, weeks, or months later. You should report any signs to your doctor, because what you are experiencing may be the first stages of a serious adverse event. You may also be entitled to compensation if a defect in your spinal cord stimulator device harmed you.

FDA Recalls of Spinal Cord Stimulators

There has been a recall of Abbott spinal cord stimulators. The recall was issued after several Infinity and Proclaim stimulators would not turn back on after being placed in MRI mode. The recall was issued on September 13, 2023. Some people whose Abbott stimulators failed after being placed in MRI mode had to have a revision surgery to have a new device implanted.

What Can Go Wrong With Spinal Cord Stimulators?

According to adverse event reports filed with the FDA, spinal cord stimulators can experience a range of malfunctions that can harm patients. According to data compiled by Public Citizen, which searched the FDA’s MAUDE database, there were 179,917 reports filed against implanted spinal cord stimulators between 2004 and 2019. Of those incident reports, 118,272 involved injuries, and 23,311 resulted in revision surgeries.

Things that can go wrong with a spinal cord stimulator include:

• Lead migration: The leads that were initially implanted in the spine may migrate from their original placement.
• Lead fractures: The wires that carry the electrical pulses may fracture/break, meaning the desired therapy is not delivered.
• Device damage: The device may become damaged and not work properly, send unnecessary shocks, or stop working altogether.
• Device power failures: The device’s power supply may fail, meaning the patient does not get any therapeutic benefit or decrease in their pain. A malfunctioning SCS battery may also cause burns or pain.

When these malfunctions happen, the patient can experience:

• Infection
• Increased pain
• Electric shocks
• Burns
• New nerve pain

According to data from 2016 to 2020, the FDA received 497 reports associated with patients’ deaths, 77,937 with patients’ injuries, and 29,294 with device malfunction. Often, these side effects result in people needing revision surgeries and new devices implanted.

According to research, patients who experience severe complications should work with their doctors to address concerns immediately. Prompt treatment of neurological injuries, infections, and biological complications can improve a patient’s long-term outcome.

Severe Pain Reported After Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery

Spinal cord stimulators promise to relieve patients’ chronic pain; however, some patients say that they have experienced new or worsening symptoms after having this device implanted. According to one study, about 20% to 40% of patients experience complications after having a spinal cord stimulator implanted.

For example, there have been several reports of people experiencing a blood clot after the implantation surgery. Others have suffered from excruciating pain, beyond the pain the patient experienced before the spinal implant. Some patients allege that the devices did not work at all, or they could not be switched into or out of MRI mode, which disables the electrical signals to control pain.

Some patients have had to have the device removed, switched out, or revised because of the complications they were experiencing. Additionally, some models of spinal cord stimulators have been recalled or have had warnings issued about them.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Companies and Manufacturers Named the Lawsuits

Some well-known medical device companies are being called out in spinal cord stimulator lawsuits filed by patients and surviving loved ones. These include Abbott (St. Jude), Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro. The claims being filed against these medical device companies include failure to warn of known risks, violating regulations, and designing defective and potentially harmful products.

Boston Scientific

Boston Scientific is being sued because of issues with several of its spinal cord stimulator models, including WaveWriter and Precision models. These devices experienced a range of problems, including where a routine system check would trigger a device reset that would make it stop sending the pain-relieving signals.

Boston Scientific is also under fire for improper dealings with the FDA. Some lawsuits allege that the company received FDA approval for a spinal cord stimulator design that was later altered and created a design defect. Plaintiffs also believe Boston Scientific was dishonest with patients and providers about the true risks, like the likelihood of the device migrating or burning the patient.

Medtronic

Medtronic’s spinal cord stimulators have also received criticism, including its now-recalled Intellis, Inceptiv, Vanta, and Restore series of implants and accessories. For example, according to a complaint, Medtronic has changed the design and features of its spinal cord stimulator dozens of times since it received FDA approval in 1984. Allegations in Medtronic lawsuits include that Medtronic has been marketing an unapproved version of the device for decades, putting patients at risk. Medtronic has also been forced to pay millions in settlements because it paid physicians to get them to use Medtronic’s devices.

Abbott (formerly St. Jude Medical)

Abbott (which acquired St. Jude Medical in January 2017) has had some of its spinal cord stimulators recalled by the FDA. For example, in 2023, the FDA recalled the Proclaim and Infinity series of spinal cord stimulators because these models would not leave MRI mode. Abbott’s Eon Mini charging systems were also defective and recalled because they would not charge correctly or they would overheat and burn patients. These device issues allegedly caused patients to suffer considerable pain, discomfort, and injuries. Lawsuits about Abbott spinal cord stimulators to allege actions taken and not taken by the company led to injuries in some patients.

Nevro Corp.

Nevro Corp. has faced several legal actions, including allegations of theft of trade secrets from competitor Boston Scientific and product liability actions filed by consumers. Some patients have suffered complications from Nevro’s high-frequency HF10 device. The electrodes (leads) in the device broke off or migrated, which allegedly caused severe pain and injuries to some patients. Battery problems also plague this model, with multiple reports of the battery glitching or not working at all.

Other Spinal Cord Stimulator Manufacturers

Other spinal cord stimulator manufacturers are being sued because their devices are allegedly causing pain and injury to patients. These include Saluda Medical, which makes the Evoke Closed Loop Stimulator system that some patients have had to have removed or revised after it was implanted. As more companies enter the spinal cord stimulator scene, they may be held accountable if they create defective devices or do not warn their patients about the range of risks to expect.

Recoverable Damages in the Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

Patients who experienced complications from a defective spinal cord stimulator may be able to secure compensation to address their losses. Payouts from a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit could include a financial award to cover the money they paid or lost because of their injuries. They may be eligible to file for a settlement to address non-monetary damages, such as loss of quality of life.

Economic Damages

Complications from spinal cord stimulators can come with an enormous cost, including:

• The medical costs to repair, switch out, or reposition the device
• Hospitalizations and doctor visits to diagnose and treat complications
• Lost wages
• A reduction in earning capacity because of device complications
• The costs of future treatments, surgeries, or therapies related to the spinal cord stimulator defect

The victim’s compensation package could include all past, current, and future financial impacts of the injuries from the defective device.

Non-Economic Damages

The victim may also qualify for the social, emotional, physical, relational, and other costs associated with the spinal cord stimulator’s defects. These could include the following injuries allegedly caused by SCS devices:

• Pain and suffering from going through the trauma caused by the defect
• Emotional distress
• The loss of quality of life or enjoyment in life because of the defect
• Permanent disfigurement or a permanent disability

The total amount of someone’s non-economic compensation package depends on factors like the extent of their losses and the proof they have to show they were harmed by the defective spinal cord stimulator.

What Proof Do I Need to File a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit?

To have a chance of winning your lawsuit, you need to be able to prove that you received a defective spinal cord stimulator and that it harmed you. Some of the evidence you might need to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit includes:

• The serial number for the device you received
• Medical records showing the date and location of your surgery
• Doctor’s notes about your complications
• Medical records about subsequent treatments or procedures you had after issues with your SCS

You might also save information about how your pain impacted your life, such as requests for time off work, a pain diary, or testimony from people who know you and your condition well. King Law can determine what evidence might be helpful in your situation and submit those requests to build a strong claim on your behalf.

How to File a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

Filing a spinal cord stimulator claim requires you to follow a specific legal process. Some of the steps you might have to follow include:

• Step 1: Talking to a seasoned product liability or medical malpractice lawyer
• Step 2: Helping the attorney gather information about the spinal cord stimulator and how it impacted you
• Step 3: The lawyer writes up a legal complaint against the spinal cord stimulator’s manufacturer
• Step 4: The attorney prepares and responds to settlement proposals
• Step 5: Your attorney fights to get you a fair compensation package through the court system (if the medical device company does not settle)

King Law is prepared to help victims navigate the legal process of suing the companies that made defective spinal cord stimulators. We have actively involved in the SCS litigation and representing clients. We understand how much it can impact someone’s life when these devices malfunction and harm the person they were supposed to help.

What Is the Deadline to File a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit?

You need to file a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit within a specific amount of time. This timeframe is called the statute of limitations. The deadline is based on state law, and it can be 1 to 6 years from when you discover the defect in your spinal cord stimulator or from when you get hurt. However, in most states, the deadline is 1 to 2 years. There are exceptions that make this deadline longer or shorter, however. A spinal cord stimulator attorney is a valuable resource who can help you determine what your filing deadlines are and how to meet those so you do not miss out on key compensation.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Verdicts and Settlements

The spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are still in their early stages in civil state court; however, some victims have received compensation. For example, a New Jersey man won a $1.25 million settlement in 2024 after his spinal cord stimulator compressed his spinal column and significantly worsened his pain and mobility challenges. Other victims may be awarded settlement packages that reflect the total losses they experienced after having an SCS device implanted.

Average Spinal Cord Stimulator Settlement Amount

There is no guaranteed or average amount that victims will receive; however, our attorneys estimate that some victims who have a successful claim may qualify for up to $100,000 if their injuries are severe. However, that is a speculative estimate based on outcomes in other medical device torts. People who file successful claims may receive more or less than that amount.

Factors that can impact the total settlement value include whether the person lost income or earning capacity because of the allegedly defective device and the medical treatments required to revise, remove, or switch out the spinal cord stimulator.

Contact a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyer Today

If you were harmed by a spinal cord stimulator, reach out to our law firm today by calling (585) 496-2648 or submitting an online contact form. We offer free consultations, and we will also review and evaluate your case for free. We have years of experience going up against large medical device companies and holding them accountable for the harm their defective products inflict on unsuspecting patients.

This page is part of our broader investigation into spinal cord stimulator lawsuits. Learn how a spinal cord stimulator attorney can help you file a claim and learn more about pain related to batteries in spinal cord stimulators.

Previous News About Spinal Cord Stimulators and Associated Lawsuits

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

List of Sources Used in This Article

Here is a list of sources used to generate this article on spinal cord stimulator lawsuits. King Law adheres to strict editorial standards when creating content for this site.

• Abbott. Abbott Completes the Acquisition of St. Jude Medical. 4 Jan. 2017.
• Associated Press. Pain Relief Devices Under Scrutiny After Patient Injuries.
• Becker’s Spine Review. Boston Scientific, FDA Sued Over Spinal Implant.
• Boston Scientific. Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) Systems.
• Cleveland Clinic. Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS): What It Is & Side Effects.
• Food and Drug Administration. About Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.
• Food and Drug Administration. Abbott Medical Recalls Proclaim and Infinity IPGs Due to Inability to Exit Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Mode.
• Food and Drug Administration. MAUDE Adverse Event Report.
• Food and Drug Administration. Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator System PMA.
• Food and Drug Administration. Recall Information.
• Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Viable Therapeutic Option?, vol. 32, no. 1, 2020, pp. 133–142.
• Justice Department. Medtronic to Pay Over $9.2 Million to Settle Allegations of Improper Payments to South Dakota Neurosurgeon. 26 July 2013.
• KVUE. Spinal Cord Stimulator Leaves Marine Paralyzed.
• Medtronic. Spinal Cord Stimulation.
• Nevro. Nevro HFX.
• Patel, Nimesh, et al. Spinal Cord Stimulation. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing, 2024.
• Public Citizen. Spinal Cord Stimulators: Unsafe, Ineffective, and Overused. June 2020.
• Understanding Spinal Cord Stimulator Complications. PMCID, 2021.
• Therapy-Related Adverse Events Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulators. PubMed, 2023.
• Use of Spinal Cord Stimulators in Chronic Pain. PubMed, 2025.
• $1.25M Settlement Reached for Paralysis After Spinal Stimulator Implanted. New Jersey Law Journal, 30 Aug. 2024.
• Spinal Cord Stimulators Face Increased Scrutiny. Medscape, 2020.
• Complications and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery, 2023.
• To Hell and Back: Devices Meant to Ease Pain Are Causing Trauma. The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 Feb. 2022.
• FDA, Onward Medical, and the Push for Home-Use Spinal Cord Stimulators. STAT News, 17 Nov. 2025.
• Spinal Cord Stimulators Found to Be Costly and Ineffective. University of Sydney, 17 July 2025.
• Spinal Cord Stimulator Procedure. University of Rochester Medical Center Health Encyclopedia.
• United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Hearing Session Filed – May 2026. May 2026.
• Wolter, T. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Perspectives. Journal of Pain Research, vol. 7, 2014, pp. 651–663.
• Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Review. PM&R, vol. 11, no. 4, 2019.
• Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management. Pain Practice.
• Calls for Action on Spinal Cord Stimulators After Patients Left in Agony. ABC News Australia, 29 Apr. 2024.
• Spinal Cord Stimulators Cancelled by TGA. ABC News Australia, 19 Aug. 2024.